Dear Subscribers,
The stakes have been raised.
As “Januworry” draws to a close, one thing is abundantly clear: based on recent regulatory movements, South Africa’s regulatory landscape is shifting with a series of decisive, high-impact proposals and enactments.
The government is placing bold bets on reform—from taxing the digital frontier of gambling to rewriting the rulebook on workplace safety and empowering whistleblowers in the fight against procurement corruption.
This isn’t just legislative noise. These changes carry direct operational, financial, and strategic implications for businesses across sectors. Whether you’re in agriculture adjusting to new fees, in telecommunications responding to a licensing inquiry, or in any industry managing workplace safety, the message is clear: proactive compliance is no longer optional—it’s a critical business imperative.
In this edition, we cut through the complexity to give you a clear, actionable overview of the most significant updates. We’ve distilled the key proposals, deadlines, and actions you need to know.
Inside This Edition:
- 🃏 The Big Bet: A deep dive into the proposed 20% national online gambling tax—what it means for operators, regulators, and the market.
- 🛡️ Safety, Redefined: The COIDA Amendments are now in effect. Discover the broader coverage, stronger enforcement, and new rehabilitation mandates.
- 📢 Whistleblowers Wanted: How the new Public Procurement Amendment Bill plans to incentivize disclosures and allow private prosecutions.
- 📋 Your Action Table: A quick-glance summary of all key legislative notices—from Competition thresholds to Labour agreements—complete with impacts and deadlines.
Navigating these changes successfully requires insight and preparation. Let’s get you briefed.
— Alison and The Legal Team
The key themes are:
GAMBLING
Gambling: Consideration of a national online gambling tax and regulatory reforms to address gaps, risks, and social costs associated with online and interactive gambling. Proposed 20% tax on gross gambling revenue (GGR) on online/interactive gambling, on top of existing provincial taxes, with broader implications for operators, regulators, financial institutions, and compliance requirements. Offshore gambling remains prohibited. In-house counsel should monitor legislation, assess tax exposure, and align compliance programs.
South Africa is considering significant reforms to the regulatory and tax environment governing online gambling, driven by concerns about rapid industry expansion, illegal interactive gambling, and the social harms associated with problem gambling. The National Treasury has proposed the introduction of a 20% national tax on gross gambling revenue (GGR) from online and interactive gambling, aimed at curbing excessive gambling, improving regulatory oversight, and harmonising national and provincial tax frameworks.
Key objectives include:
Addressing Regulatory Gaps:
Online betting is legal only through licensed bookmakers, while interactive gambling—such as online casinos, poker, and digital slot machines—remains illegal under the National Gambling Act of 2004. The lack of implementation of the National Gambling Amendment Act of 2008 has left interactive gambling unregulated, despite its growing prevalence.
Introducing a National Online Gambling Tax:
National Treasury proposes a 20% tax on GGR, in addition to existing provincial taxes of 6–9%. Combined, operators would face an effective tax range of 26% to 29%, potentially generating more than R10 billion in additional revenue. The tax is intended to internalize social costs and discourage harmful gambling behaviours rather than solely raise revenue.
Clarifying the Legal Landscape:
- Online Betting: Legal when offered by licensed South African bookmakers.
- Interactive Gambling: Illegal and currently unregulated, though still subject to the proposed national tax.
- Offshore Gambling: Prohibited; banks must block transactions, and illegal winnings may be confiscated.
Stakeholder Impact:
The proposal affects online betting operators, regulators, gambling boards, financial institutions, and individuals engaged in betting or gambling activities. Operators will be required to register with SARS, update internal controls, increase reporting, and prepare for heightened compliance requirements.
International Benchmarking:
Countries including the UK, New Zealand, Kenya, and Australia already impose taxes on online gambling to mitigate social harm. South Africa’s proposed tax structure aligns with these international norms and seeks to modernize an outdated regulatory regime.
Implications for In-House Counsel:
Counsel must prepare organisations for potentially sweeping changes by monitoring legislation, assessing tax exposures, reviewing compliance frameworks, evaluating risk mitigation strategies, and engaging proactively with regulators and industry associations.
The proposed reforms represent a major shift in how online gambling is regulated, taxed, and monitored in South Africa. They aim to modernize the legislative environment, strengthen oversight, and reduce the social costs associated with the expanding online gambling sector. Interested stakeholders should closely track the policy process, as changes may have wide-ranging operational, financial, and compliance implications for the gambling industry and associated sectors.
HEALTH AND SAFETY
Health and Safety: Implementation of amendments to the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act (COIDA) 2022, expanding coverage, reforming governance, increasing compliance enforcement, and emphasizing rehabilitation to support return-to-work for injured workers.
Focus
Amendments to the COIDA, as per the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Amendment Act, 2022, are now effective.
Summed up
The Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Amendment Act 2022, brings significant changes to South Africa’s approach to workplace injury and disease compensation.
- Broader Definitions: The Act expands key terms like “accident,” “employee,” and “dependant,” increasing the scope of who is covered.
- Governance Overhaul: A new Board structure with clear appointment, disqualification, and removal criteria aims to improve Fund oversight.
- Stronger Compliance: New administrative penalties, compliance orders, and inspector powers ensure better enforcement and employer accountability.
- Rehabilitation Focus: Mandates clinical, vocational, and social rehabilitation to support injured workers’ return to work and independence.
Understanding these updates is crucial for employers, employees, and service providers to ensure compliance and maximize the benefits of the new system.
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
Public Procurement: Introduction of the Public Procurement Amendment Bill 2026 to combat corruption and state capture. Notable provisions include whistleblower incentives, private prosecutions when NPA action is lacking, and amendments to the Public Procurement Act 2024 to formalize disclosures and penalties. Public comments invited within 30 days.
MS M.P. Kobe, MP, intends to introduce the Public Procurement Amendment Bill, 2026, in Parliament.
The bill aims to address issues of corruption and state capture in South Africa, particularly in the public procurement sector, which accounts for over R800 billion in annual expenditure.
Key objectives include:
- Whistleblower Incentives: Institutionalizing monetary rewards for whistleblowers whose disclosures lead to the recovery of state funds, addressing the risks and challenges whistleblowers face.
- Private Prosecutions: Allowing private prosecutions for corruption cases when the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) fails to act.
- Amendments to the Public Procurement Act, 2024: Introducing provisions for whistleblower disclosures, monetary rewards, and offences related to whistleblower disclosures.
The bill draws inspiration from international models like the U.S. False Claims Act, which has proven effective in recovering funds through whistleblower incentivization.
Interested parties are invited to submit written comments on the draft bill within 30 days of the notice.
The draft bill can be accessed online at the provided link.
The contents also outline sector-specific regulatory items (Agricultural, Competition, Customs, Electronic Communications, Finance, Labour, Medical, Standards, Transport, Advertising, B-BBEE, and Tobacco) with an emphasis on proposed amendments, regulatory changes, and opportunities for stakeholder input.
Alison and The Legal Team
CONTENTS:
Agricultural Product Standards Act: Regulations: Departmental Fees: Amendment
Competition Act: Determination of merger thresholds: Amendment: Comments invited
CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE
Customs and Excise Act: Imposition of Provisional Payment (PP/178)
Customs and Excise Act: Amendment to Part 1 of Schedule No. 1 (No. 1/1/1966)
Electronic Communications Act: Regulations: End-user and subscriber service charter: Amendment
Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Amendment Act: Commencement
Medical Schemes Act: Adjustment to fees payable to brokers
Public Procurement Amendment Bill: Explanatory summary: Comments invited
Standards Act: Standards matters: Comments invited
Transportation: Road Carrier Permits
MTN’S Router Claims Deemed Misleading
State dangles carrot in form of BEE points
No big tax changes in February budget, says Godongwana
SARS is coming after taxpayers with a new weapon, leaving nowhere to hide
Pick n Pay again fails to avoid liability for shopper’s injuries
SA losing ground to illicit economy, Sars warns
ANC condemns scholar transport operators’ ‘arrogance’ in flouting law after accident
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Table of Legislative & Regulatory Items
| Name of Law / Notice | Topic or Area | Impacted Parties or Department | Impact in a Nutshell | Action | Deadline if Applicable |
| Draft National Online Gambling Tax Policy | Gambling / Taxation | Online betting operators, interactive gambling platforms, regulators (National Treasury, SARS, Gambling Boards), financial institutions, gamblers. | Introduction of a 20% national tax on gross gambling revenue (GGR), creating a total effective tax rate of 26-29%. Aims to regulate the sector, curb illegal gambling, and internalize social costs. | Monitor legislation, assess tax exposure, update compliance frameworks, prepare for SARS registration and reporting. | Public comment deadline was extended (see specific notice). |
| Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Amendment Act, 2022 | Health and Safety / Labour | All employers, employees, the Compensation Fund, service providers, occupational health practitioners. | Expands coverage definitions, overhauls Fund governance, introduces penalties and compliance orders, mandates rehabilitation programs for injured workers. | Update workplace policies and reporting procedures, ensure compliance with new coverage rules, prepare for enhanced enforcement. | Act is now effective. |
| Public Procurement Amendment Bill, 2026 | Public Procurement / Anti-Corruption | All government entities, suppliers to state, whistleblowers, National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), civil society. | Seeks to combat corruption via monetary rewards for whistleblowers and allowing private prosecutions if NPA fails to act. | Review draft bill, assess implications for procurement processes and fraud risk management. | Submit written comments within 30 days of the notice’s publication. |
| Agricultural Product Standards Act: Amendment of Departmental Fees | Agriculture / Standards | Agricultural producers, food processors, importers/exporters, storage & distribution businesses. | Changes to fees charged for departmental services (inspections, certifications, etc.) related to regulated agricultural products. | Review new fee schedule, adjust operational budgets for compliance costs. | Effective upon publication (23 Jan 2026). |
| Competition Act: Amendment of Merger Filing Fees & Thresholds | Competition / Mergers | Companies involved in mergers and acquisitions, legal advisors, the Competition Commission. | Adjusts the financial thresholds for mandatory merger notifications and the associated filing fees. | Review new thresholds for upcoming M&A transactions, budget for revised filing costs. | Comments invited on draft amendments. |
| Customs and Excise Act: Imposition of Provisional Payment & Tariff Amendment | Customs & International Trade | Importers, exporters, manufacturers, logistics companies. | Imposes a new provisional payment and amends tariff rates on specified goods. | Apply new tariff codes and rates, account for provisional payments in costing. | Effective dates specified in the notices. |
| Electronic Communications Act: Inquiry & Charter Amendment | Electronic Communications | Telecommunications operators, network service providers, consumers. | Extends consultation on new licences and amends regulations on end-user service charters (quality of service standards). | Participate in inquiry, review and implement updated service charter requirements. | Closing date for inquiry responses extended. |
| Labour Relations Act: Various Notices (Bargaining Councils, Essential Services, etc.) | Labour / Industrial Relations | Employers and employees in specified industries (civil engineering, leather, motor, etc.), airlines, telecom infrastructure maintainers. | Extends collective agreements to non-parties, cancels some agreements, investigates designation of new essential services, registers new employers’ organisation. | Check applicability of extended agreements, prepare for potential essential service designation (no strike clauses). | Various effective dates as per specific notices. |
| Basic Conditions of Employment Act: Intention to Deem Performers as Employees | Labour | Advertising, artistic, and cultural sectors engaging performers. | Aims to reclassify certain performers as employees, granting them full labour rights and benefits. | Review engagement models for performers in light of proposed change. | Comments invited on the intention. |
| Medical Schemes Act: Adjustment to Broker Fees | Medical / Healthcare | Medical schemes, brokers, healthcare beneficiaries. | Adjusts the maximum fees payable by medical schemes to brokers for their services. | Update broker service contracts and scheme administration systems. | Effective upon publication. |
AGRICULTURAL
|
| LAW AND TYPE OF NOTICE
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT STANDARDS ACT:
Regulations: Departmental Fees: Amendment
G 53984 RG 11929 GoN 7010
23 January 2026
|
| APPLIES TO:
Any organization involved in the production, processing, import, export, inspection, storage, or certification of agricultural products regulated under the APS Act will be affected by the amended departmental fees.
1. Agricultural Producers 2. Food Processors & Manufacturers 4. Exporters of Agricultural Goods 5. Storage & Distribution Businesses Handling Regulated Goods |
| SUMMARY
Amendments to the Regulations Regarding Departmental Fees under the Agricultural Product Standards Act, 1990 (Act 119 of 1990)
|
| FULL TEXT
|
| DETAILS
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, LAND REFORM AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT NO. R. 7010 23 January 2026
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT STANDARDS ACT, 1990 (ACT No. 119 OF 1990)
REGULATIONS REGARDING DEPARTMENTAL FEES: AMENDMENT
The Minister for Agriculture has, under section 15 of the Agricultural Product Standards Act, 1990 (Act No. 119 of 1990) –
(a) made the regulations in the Schedule; and (b) determined that the said regulations shall come into operation on 1 April 2026.
SCHEDULE
Definition
1. In this Schedule “the Regulations” means the Regulations published by Government Notice No. R. 1259 of 27 September 2019, as amended by Government Notices Nos. R. 179 of 21 February 2020, R. 359 of 23 April 2021, R. 1918 of 25 March 2022 and R. 2956, 27 January 2023, R. 4367 of 16 February 2024 and R. 5818 of 31 January 2025.
Substitution of Tables 1,2,3,4 and 5 in the Regulations
2. The Regulations are hereby amended by substituting Tables 1,2,3,4 and 5 with the following Tables respectively:
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE FULL GAZETTE:
AGRICULTURAL: AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT STANDARDS ACT: REGULATIONS: DEPARTMENTAL FEES: AMENDMENT G 53984 RG 11929 GON 7010 23 JANUARY 2026
|
| LINK TO FULL NOTICE
Agricultural Product Standards Act: Regulations: Departmental Fees: AmendmentG 53984 RG 11929 GoN 7010 23 January 2026
|
| ACTION
Affected organizations need to take note of the new set of Departmental fees.
|
END
COMPETITION
| LAW AND TYPE OF NOTICE
COMPETITION ACT:
Rules for conduct of proceedings in Competition Commission: Rule 10 (5): Merger Filing Fees: Amendment: Comments invited
G 54021 GoN 7030
– Comment by 10 Mar 2026
27 January 2026
|
| APPLIES TO:
Any organization that is a party to an intermediate or large merger under the Competition Act will be directly affected
1. Companies Engaging in Mergers or Acquisitions 2. Large Corporations Across All Sectors 3. Holding Companies, Investment Firms & Private Equity 4. Legal, Competition Law & Corporate Advisory Firms 5. Multinational Enterprises Merging with or Acquiring SA Operations 6. Industry Associations & Business Chambers |
| FULL TEXT
|
| DETAILS
DEPARTMENT OF TRADE INDUSTRY AND COMPETITION
NO. 7030 27 January 2026
DRAFT AMENDMENT TO RULE 10(5) OF THE RULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE COMPETITION COMMISSION – MERGER FILING FEES INVITATION FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS
1. By virtue of the powers vested in me in terms of section 21(4) of the Competition Act, 89 of 1998, as amended, I, Mr. Mpho Parks Tau, Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, in consultation with the Commissioner, hereby publish for public comments the draft amendment to Regulation 10(5) of the Competition Commission Rules for public comment as set out in the Schedule hereto.
2. The purpose of the proposed amendment to Regulation 10(5) of the Competition Commission Rules, as set out in the Schedule hereto, is to update and effect an inflationary adjustment to the merger filing fees gazetted in General Notice 1336 of 2018 (published in Government Notice No. 42082 of 4 December 2018). The merger filing fees have not been updated since 2018.
3. Interested persons are invited to submit comments in writing on the proposed amendment to Regulation 10(5) of the Competition Commission Rules within a period of 30 business days of the publication of this notice to the Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, for the attention of Dr Ivan Galodikwe, email IGalodikwe@thedtic.gov.za OR hand delivered at
3rd Floor, Block E, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, 0132. MR MPHO PARKS TAU, MP MINISTER OF TRADE, INDUSTRY AND COMPETITION Date: 23/01/2026
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE FULL GAZETTE NOTICE:
G 54021 GON 7030 – COMMENT BY 10 MAR 2026
|
| LINK TO FULL NOTICE
Competition Act: Rules for conduct of proceedings in Competition Commission: Rule 10 (5): Merger Filing Fees: Amendment: Comments invitedG 54021 GoN 7030 – Comment by 10 Mar 2026 27 January 2026
|
| ACTION
Ensure that you submit your comments before 10 March 2026.
|
END
| LAW AND TYPE OF NOTICE
COMPETITION ACT:
Determination of merger thresholds: Amendment: Comments invited
G 54020 GoN 7029
– Comment by 10 Mar 2026
27 January 2026
|
| APPLIES TO:
1. Companies Engaging in Mergers or Acquisitions 2. Large Corporations Across All Sectors 3. Medium‑Sized Firms Considering Expansion Through Acquisition 4. Private Equity Firms, Investment Holdings & Venture Capital Funds 5. Multinational Corporations Acquiring South African Businesses 6. Legal and Advisory Firms Handling Merger Filings 7. Industry Associations and Business Bodies |
| SUMMARY
Proposed Amendments
Definitions (Part A)
Lower Merger Threshold Amendments
(Thresholds that determine when a merger becomes an intermediate merger)
Combined turnover or assets threshold increases:
Transferred firm thresholds increased:
Higher Merger Threshold Amendments
(Thresholds that determine when a merger becomes a large merger)
Combined turnover or assets threshold increases:
Transferred firm thresholds increased:
|
| FULL TEXT
|
| DETAILS
DEPARTMENT OF TRADE INDUSTRY AND COMPETITION
NO.7029 27 January 2026
DRAFT AMENDMENT OF THE DETERMINATION OF MERGER THRESHOLDS AS SET OUT IN GENERAL NOTICE 1003 OF 2017 INVITATION FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS
By virtue of the powers vested in me in terms of section 11 of the Competition Act, 89 of 1998, as amended, I, Mr. Mpho Parks Tau, Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, in consultation with the Competition Commission, hereby publish for public comments the draft amendment of the Determination of Merger Thresholds as set out in Part A of General Notice 1003 of 2017 (published in Government Notice No. 41124 of 15 September 2017) as set out in the Schedule hereto.
The Method of Calculation set out in Part B of the General Notice 1254 of 2017 (published in Government Notice No. 41245 of 10 November 2017) shall remain unchanged. Stakeholders and interested persons are invited to submit comments in writing on the proposed amendment within a period of 30 business days of the publication of this notice to the Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, for the attention of Dr Ivan Galodikwe, email IGalodikwe@thedtic.gov.za OR hand delivered at 3rd Floor, Block E, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, 0132.
MR MPHO PARKS TAU, MP MINISTER OF TRADE, INDUSTRY AND COMPETITION Date:23/01/2026
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE FULL GAZETTE:
COMPETITION ACT: COMPETITION ACT: DETERMINATION OF MERGER THRESHOLDS: AMENDMENT: COMMENTS INVITED G 54020 GON 7029 – COMMENT BY 10 MAR 2026 27 JANUARY 2026
|
| LINK TO FULL NOTICE
Competition Act: Determination of merger thresholds: Amendment: Comments invitedG 54020 GoN 7029 – Comment by 10 Mar 2026 27 January 2026
|
| ACTION
Ensure that you submit your comments before 10 March 2026.
|
END
CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE
|
| LAW AND TYPE OF NOTICE
CUSTOMS AND EXCISE ACT:
Imposition of Provisional Payment (PP/178)
G 53984 RG 11929 GoN 7018
23 January 2026
|
| APPLIES TO:
1. Importers of Float Glass 2. Glass Distributors & Wholesalers 3. Manufacturers & Fabricators Using Float Glass 4. Construction & Infrastructure Companies 5. Retailers of Building & Home Improvement Materials 6. Tanzanian Exporters / Manufacturers 7. Logistics & Supply Chain Service Providers |
| FULL TEXT
|
| DETAILS
CUSTOMS AND EXCISE ACT, 1964.
IMPOSITION OF PROVISIONAL PAYMENT (PP/178)
NO. R. 7018 23 January 2026
In terms of section 57A of the Customs and Excise Act, 1964, a provisional payment in relation to anti-dumping duty is imposed, up to and including 22 July 2026, to the extent set out in the Schedule hereto.
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE FULL GAZETTE:
CUSTOM AND EXCISE: CUSTOMS AND EXCISE ACT: IMPOSITION OF PROVISIONAL PAYMENT (PP/178) G 53984 RG 11929 GON 7018 23 JANUARY 2026
|
| LINK TO FULL NOTICE
Customs and Excise Act: Imposition of Provisional Payment (PP/178) (English / Afrikaans)G 53984 RG 11929 GoN 7018 23 January 2026
|
| ACTION
Take note
|
END
| LAW AND TYPE OF NOTICE
CUSTOMS AND EXCISE ACT:
Amendment to Part 1 of Schedule No. 1 (No. 1/1/1966)
G 53984 RG 11929 GoN 7019
23 January 2026
|
| APPLIES TO:
1. Importers of Frozen Molluscs / Seafood 2. Seafood Distributors & Wholesalers 3. Retailers Selling Frozen Seafood 4. Food Processors & Manufacturers Using Molluscs 5. Hospitality & Catering Providers 6. Customs Brokers, Clearing Agents & Freight Forwarders 7. Exporters to South Africa (Foreign). |
| FULL TEXT
|
| DETAILS
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE FULL GAZETTE:
CUSTOMS AND EXCISE: CUSTOMS AND EXCISE ACT: AMENDMENT TO PART 1 OF SCHEDULE NO. 1 (NO. 1/1/1966) G 53984 RG 11929 GON 7019 23 JANUARY 2026
|
| LINK TO FULL NOTICE
Customs and Excise Act: Amendment to Part 1 of Schedule No. 1 (No. 1/1/1966) (English / Afrikaans)G 53984 RG 11929 GoN 7019 23 January 2026
|
| ACTION
Take note. |
END
ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS
|
| LAW AND TYPE OF NOTICE
ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS ACT:
Questionnaire of the Inquiry into New Individual Electronic Communications Network Service Licences: Extension of closing date for written responses
G 54018 GeN 3739
– Comment by 16 Feb 2026
27 January 2026
|
| FULL TEXT
|
| DETAILS
INDEPENDENT COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY OF SOUTH AFRICA
NOTICE 3739 OF 2026
GENERAL NOTICE
ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS ACT, 2005 (ACT NO. 36 OF 2005)
NOTICE TO EXTEND THE CLOSING DATE FOR WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE OF THE INQUIRY INTO NEW INDIVIDUAL ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK SERVICE LICENCES
On 25 November 2025, the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (“the Authority”) published its Notice of intention to conduct an Inquiry into new Individual Electronic Communications Network Service licences in Government Notice No. 53719 published in Government Gazette No. 3644 of 2025.
Interested persons were invited to provide responses to the questionnaire within forty-five (45) working days after the publication of the Notice in the Gazette (i.e., no later than 02 February 2026).
The Authority has received and considered request(s) from stakeholders to extend the deadline to submit responses or comments.
The Authority hereby extends the deadline to 16 February 2026.
However, it should be noted that no further extensions beyond the aforementioned closing date will be considered and/or granted by the Authority. ________________________ MOTHIBI G. RAMUSI CHAIRPERSON DATE: 23 /01/2026
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE FULL GAZETTE:
G 54018 GEN 3739 – COMMENT BY 16 FEB 2026 27 JANUARY 2026
|
| LINK TO FULL NOTICE
Electronic Communications Act: Questionnaire of the Inquiry into New Individual Electronic Communications Network Service Licences: Extension of closing date for written responsesG 54018 GeN 3739 – Comment by 16 Feb 2026 27 January 2026
|
| ACTION
Ensure that you submit your comments before 16 February 2026.
|
END
| LAW AND TYPE OF NOTICE
ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS ACT:
Regulations: End-user and subscriber service charter: Amendment
G 53991 GoN 7027
23 January 2026
| ||||||||||||
| APPLIES TO:
The organisations most directly affected are all entities licensed by ICASA that provide mobile or electronic communications services, especially those selling:
| ||||||||||||
| SUMMARY
1. Notice & Introduction
The Chairperson of ICASA publishes the sixth amendment to the End‑User and Subscriber Service Charter Regulations of 2016. The notice announces that amendments are officially made and will take effect after 12 months.
2. Schedule of Amendments
2.1. Definitions (Regulation 1 amendments)
Several key definitions are added, deleted, or modified:
3. Amendment of Regulation 5 — Promotional Tariffs
Licensees must submit all promotional tariffs and the dates they apply at least 5 days before launch (previously 7 days).
4. Substitution of Regulation 8A — Voice, SMS and Data Services
4.1 Usage Depletion Notifications
Licensees must send depletion notifications at:
4.2 User Options (Opt‑In / Opt‑Out)
Licensees must allow users to:
4.3 OOB Blocking
If a bundle is depleted AND the user has not opted in to OOB charges:
4.4 Sequential Bundle Usage Rule
A “First‑Expiry‑First‑Out” (FEFO) rule now applies:
4.5 Bundle Roll‑Over
Licensees must:
4.6 Bundle Transfer
Licensees must allow users to:
4.7 Extension Due to Licensee Fault
If the user is unable to use a bundle because of a licensee‑related fault, the bundle validity period must be extended.
Users must report faults to qualify.
5. Repeal of Regulation 8B
Regulation 8B — previously dealing with OOB rules and notifications — is formally repealed. Its provisions are merged into newly substituted 8A.
6. Short Title & Commencement
The amendments are officially titled:
“End‑User and Subscriber Service Charter Amendment Regulations, 2025.”
They will be effective 12 months after publication in the gazette.
| ||||||||||||
| FULL TEXT
| ||||||||||||
| DETAILS
INDEPENDENT COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY OF SOUTH AFRICA
NO. 7027 23 January 2026
END-USER AND SUBSCRIBER SERVICE CHARTER AMENDMENT REGULATIONS, 2025
I, Mothibi Ramusi, Chairperson of the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (“the Authority”), hereby publishes the sixth amendment to the Enduser and Subscriber Service Charter Regulations 2016 to the extent reflected in the Schedule. ___________________________ MOTHIBI G. RAMUSI CHAIRPERSON DATE: 25/11/2025
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE FULL GAZETTE:
G 53991 GON 7027 23 JANUARY 2026
| ||||||||||||
| LINK TO FULL NOTICE
Electronic Communications Act: Regulations: End-user and subscriber service charter: AmendmentG 53991 GoN 7027 23 January 2026
| ||||||||||||
| ACTION
|
END
FINANCE
|
| LAW AND TYPE OF NOTICE
SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICE ACT:
Schedule 1: Legislation administered by Commissioner: Amendment
G 53991 GoN 7028
23 January 2026
|
| APPLIES TO:
If an organisation pays tax, imports/exports, employs staff, conducts regulated financial transactions, or operates in a sector with special taxes or levies — it is affected
1. All taxpayers and tax‑regulated entities 2. Importers, exporters, and customs‑regulated businesses 3. Sectors subject to special taxes or levies 4. Financial market participants 5. Any organisation claiming incentives or relief |
| SUMMARY
The amendment updates which legislation SARS is responsible for administering. When such a change occurs, it typically means:
|
| FULL TEXT
|
| DETAILS
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE FULL GAZETTE:
G 53991 GON 7028 23 JANUARY 2026
|
| LINK TO FULL NOTICE
South African Revenue Service Act: Schedule 1: Legislation administered by Commissioner: Amendment (English / Afrikaans)G 53991 GoN 7028 23 January 2026
|
| ACTION
Take note of the legislation that SARS is responsible for administering.
|
END
GAMBLING
|
| EXPLAINED AND UNPACKED
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF EACH SECTION
1. Introduction
Gambling encompasses various activities, such as betting, lotteries, and casino games, and ranges from recreational to pathological behaviors. While recreational gambling poses no societal costs, problem and pathological gambling can lead to financial stress, family issues, and mental health challenges. The rise of online gambling has increased accessibility and normalization, necessitating government intervention to mitigate negative externalities.
2. Background
Gambling in South Africa evolved from prohibition under the 1965 Gambling Act to legalization in the 1990s, following the Wiehahn Commission’s recommendations. The National Gambling Act of 2004 introduced stricter regulations and prohibited interactive gambling. Despite the National Gambling Amendment Act of 2008 aiming to regulate online gambling, it remains unimplemented, leaving the sector unregulated.
3. Overview of Gambling Sector
The South African gambling industry generated R1.50 trillion in turnover in 2024/2025, with betting accounting for 75% of the total. Online betting dominates the market, representing over 85.5% of betting gross gambling revenue (GGR). The industry has experienced significant growth, particularly in online betting, which has surpassed casinos as the largest gambling segment.
4. Regulatory Environment
Gambling regulation is shared between national and provincial governments, with the National Gambling Act of 2004 as the primary legislation. While online betting through licensed bookmakers is legal, interactive gambling remains prohibited. The regulatory framework has not kept pace with technological advancements, creating gaps in addressing online gambling.
5. The Role of Taxation
Taxation is proposed as a tool to address the social costs of gambling and discourage excessive gambling. Provinces currently impose taxes on gambling activities, but rates are low. A national online gambling tax based on gross gambling revenue is proposed to ensure uniformity, streamline administration, and mitigate societal costs.
6. International Experience
Countries like the UK, New Zealand, Kenya, and Australia have implemented various gambling regulations and taxes to address social costs and generate revenue. These examples highlight the importance of balancing taxation rates to discourage excessive gambling while maintaining compliance and preventing illegal activities.
7. Policy Considerations and Options
A national online gambling tax is proposed to address the societal costs of problem gambling and regulate the growing online gambling industry. The tax would be set at 20% of gross gambling revenue, in addition to provincial taxes, to streamline administration, discourage harmful behaviors, and generate revenue.
8. Administrative Considerations
The proposed tax would require local online betting operators to register with SARS and provide necessary information for compliance. This would simplify administration and ensure that interactive gambling activities, even if currently illegal, are subject to taxation.
CONCLUSION
The gambling industry has shifted significantly toward online platforms, creating new challenges such as increased problem gambling. A national online gambling tax is proposed to address these challenges, internalize societal costs, and provide a regulatory framework for the evolving industry. The tax aims to discourage harmful gambling behaviors while generating additional revenue for the government.
|
| FULL TEXT
|
| DETAILS
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE FULL DOCUMENT:
GAMBLING: MEDIA STATEMENT: EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS IN RESPECT OF THE DRAFT NATIONAL ONLINE GAMBLING TAX DISCUSSION PAPER
|
| ACTION
WHAT SHOULD IN-HOUSE COUNSEL BE DOING Recommendations for In-House Counsel in the Gaming Sector
In light of the proposed national online gambling tax and regulatory changes, in-house counsel should take proactive steps to ensure compliance, mitigate risks, and prepare for potential impacts on their organization.
Key actions include:
1. Monitor Legislative Developments
2. Assess Tax Implications
3. Review Licensing and Operational Compliance
4. Strengthen Internal Controls
5. Evaluate Risk Mitigation Strategies
6. Engage with Stakeholders
7. Educate and Train Internal Teams
8. Prepare for Public and Consumer Impact
9. Evaluate International Operations
10. Conduct a Strategic Review
By taking these steps, in-house counsel can help their organizations navigate the evolving regulatory landscape, ensure compliance, and adapt to the proposed national online gambling tax effectively.
|
END
HEALTH AND SAFETY
|
| SUMMARY
Summary of the Amendment Act and Proclamation
1. Overview of the Amendment Act
The Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Amendment Act, 2022(Act No. 10 of 2022) amends the original Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, 1993. The amendments include changes to definitions, the roles and functions of the Commissioner, provisions for rehabilitation and reintegration of injured employees, regulation of healthcare services, review of pension claims, administrative penalties, compliance, and enforcement mechanisms.
2. Key Sections of the Amendment Act
Below is a detailed summary of the key sections:
1. Section 1: Definitions
2. Section 4: Functions of the Commissioner
3. Section 11-13: Governance of the Compensation Fund
4. Section 70A: Rehabilitation and Reintegration
5. Section 93A-93G: Compliance and Enforcement
6. Section 99: Penalties
7. Section 64: Prohibition on Employer Deductions
8. Section 86-87: Employer Assessments
9. Section 63: Transitional Arrangements
3. Proclamation Notice
The Proclamation Notice 306 of 2026, issued by President Cyril Ramaphosa, officially sets the commencement date for the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Amendment Act, 2022. The proclamation confirms that the Act will take effect on January 21, 2026, with the exception of clauses .
Overview of the Amendments
The Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Amendment Act, 2022(Act No. 10 of 2022) introduces key changes to South Africa’s Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act (COIDA). These amendments, effective from 21 January 2026, are designed to enhance the protection and rights of employees while ensuring that employers comply with updated regulations. Understanding these changes is crucial for both employers and employees to navigate the new landscape effectively.
Key Changes Explained
1. Broader Definitions
The amendments expand the definitions of several key terms:
Action for Employers: Update internal policies and contracts to align with these new definitions and ensure HR teams are trained on the revised terminology.
2. Governance Overhaul
The structure of the Compensation Fund Board has been revamped:
Action for Employers: Ensure compliance with the new Board structure and assist in drafting the Board Charter within the specified timeframe.
3. Focus on Rehabilitation and Reintegration
Employers are now required to provide comprehensive rehabilitation services, which include:
Action for Employers: Develop partnerships with healthcare providers to establish rehabilitation programs and allocate resources for these services.
4. Stricter Compliance and Enforcement
New measures have been introduced to ensure employers adhere to the regulations:
Action for Employers: Prepare for inspections by keeping records up-to-date and implementing systems to monitor compliance with reporting and record-keeping obligations.
5. Claims and Compensation
The amendments extend the period for employees to submit claims from 12 months to three years, allowing more time for those injured to seek compensation. Additionally, monthly pensions will start from the date of maximum medical intervention certification.
Action for Employers: Revise claims procedures to reflect the extended deadlines and communicate these changes to employees.
6. Inclusion of Domestic Employees
Domestic workers are now included under COIDA, with a transitional period of three years to report any accidents that occurred before the amendments took effect.
Action for Employers: Identify and ensure the inclusion of domestic workers in compliance with the Act, and educate employers about their new responsibilities.
Important Deadlines
Conclusion: Embracing the Changes
These amendments to COIDA represent a significant step forward in protecting workers’ rights and ensuring employers are held accountable. It is essential for both parties to understand and implement these changes effectively to foster a safer and more supportive work environment.
For additional guidance or clarification, please consult your legal advisor or the Compensation Fund’s resources.
| ||||||||||
| EXPLAINED AND UNPACKED
Here is a detailed breakdown of all sections amended in the document: Section 1: Amendment of Section 1 of Act 130 of 1993
Section 4: Amendment of Section 12
Section 5: Substitution of Section 13
Section 6: Insertion of Sections 13A, 13B, and 13C
Section 7: Repeal of Section 14
Section 8: Amendment of Section 16
Section 9: Amendment of Section 17
Section 10: Amendment of Section 18
Section 11: Amendment of Section 20
Section 12: Amendment of Section 22
Section 13: Amendment of Section 23
Section 14: Amendment of Section 25
Section 15: Amendment of Section 26
Section 16: Amendment of Section 30
Section 17: Amendment of Section 32
Section 18: Amendment of Section 36
Section 19: Amendment of Section 39
Section 20: Amendment of Section 40
Section 21: Amendment of Section 41
Section 22: Amendment of Section 42
Section 23: Amendment of Section 43
Section 24: Substitution of Section 44
Section 25: Amendment of Section 45
Section 26: Amendment of Section 46
Section 27: Substitution of Heading to Chapter VI
Section 28: Amendment of Section 47
Section 29: Amendment of Section 48
Section 30: Amendment of Section 49
Section 31: Insertion of Section 49A
Section 32: Amendment of Section 54
Section 33: Amendment of Section 56
Section 34: Amendment of Section 57
Section 35: Amendment of Section 59
Section 36: Substitution of Section 64
Section 37: Amendment of Section 65
Section 38: Substitution of Section 67
Section 39: Amendment of Section 69
Section 40: Amendment of Section 70
Section 41: Insertion of Chapter VIIA
Section 42: Amendment of Section 72
Section 43: Amendment of Section 73
Section 44: Amendment of Section 74
Section 45: Amendment of Section 75
Section 46: Amendment of Section 76
Section 47: Amendment of Section 78
Section 48: Substitution of Section 79
Section 49: Amendment of Section 80
Section 50: Substitution of Section 81
Section 51: Amendment of Section 83
Section 52: Amendment of Section 85
Section 53: Substitution of Section 86
Section 54: Amendment of Section 87
Section 55: Amendment of Section 88
Section 56: Substitution of Section 89
Section 57: Amendment of Section 90
Section 58: Amendment of Section 91
Section 59: Insertion of Chapter XA
Section 60: Amendment of Section 97
Section 61: Substitution of Section 99
Section 62: Substitution of Certain Expressions
Section 63: Transitional Arrangements
Section 64: Short Title and Commencement
This completes the summary of all amended sections in the document. Impact on OrganizationsThe amendments significantly impact organizations in the following ways:
1. Expanded Coverage:
2. Rehabilitation and Reintegration:
3. Compliance and Enforcement:
4. Administrative Penalties:
|
| FULL TEXT
| ||
| DETAILS
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE FULL GAZETTE
HEALTH AND SAFETY: COMPENSATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL INJURIES AND DISEASES AMENDMENT ACT: COMMENCEMENT G 53990 P 306 23 JANUARY 2026
| ||
| LINK TO FULL NOTICE
Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Amendment Act: Commencement (English / Afrikaans)G 53990 P 306 23 January 2026
Related links Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Amendment Act 10 of 2022
Full text
10 of 2022
The Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Amendment Act 10 of 2022 intends:
Commencement
1 February 2026: Sections 3 to 6
1. Section 3: Amendment of Section 11 of Act 130 of 1993
2. Section 4: Amendment of Section 12 of Act 130 of 1993
3. Section 5: Substitution of Section 13 of Act 130 of 1993
4. Section 6: Insertion of Sections 13A, 13B, and 13C in Act 130 of 1993
1 April 2026: Sections 19(a) and (b), 20(c), 28(c), 36(1), 50(3), 52, 54(1) and (2)
1. Section 19(a) and (b): Amendment of Section 39 of Act 130 of 1993
2. Section 20(c): Amendment of Section 40 of Act 130 of 1993
3. Section 28(c): Amendment of Section 47 of Act 130 of 1993
4. Section 36(1): Amendment of Section 64 of Act 130 of 1993
5. Section 50(3): Substitution of Section 81 of Act 130 of 1993
6. Section 52: Amendment of Section 85 of Act 130 of 1993
7. Section 54(1) and (2): Amendment of Section 87 of Act 130 of 1993
Commencement to be announced: Section 1(g) and (h) in relation to subparagraphs (i), (ii), and (iii) of the definition of ’employee’
These provisions will come into effect on dates announced by the President in the Government Gazette.
| ||
| ACTION
Compliance Framework and Management PlanBelow is a detailed action plan for each amended section, incorporating the effective date.
Detailed Action Plan for Each Amended Section
1. Definitions (Section 1)
Effective Date: 21 January 2026
Action Plan:
2. Board and Governance (Sections 11-13C)- applies to Regulator’s Board
Effective Date: 21 January 2026
Action Plan:
3. Rehabilitation and Reintegration (Chapter VIIA, Section 70A)
Effective Date: 21 January 2026 Action Plan:
4. Compliance and Enforcement (Chapter XA, Sections 93A-93G)
Effective Date: 21 January 2026 Action Plan:
5. Administrative Penalties (Sections 39, 64, 81, 83, 86, 87, 99)
Effective Date: 21 January 2026
Action Plan:
6. Changes to Claims and Compensation (Sections 44, 49, 49A, 54)
Effective Date: 21 January 2026
Action Plan:
7. Domestic Employees (Section 63)
Effective Date: 21 January 2026
Action Plan:
8. Third-Party Registration (Section 73)
Effective Date: 21 January 2026
Action Plan:
9. Other Amendments
Effective Date: 21 January 2026
Action Plan:
General Recommendations
By following this detailed action plan, legal and compliance teams can ensure that their organization is fully prepared to comply with the amended Act and mitigate potential risks.
Key Components of the Framework
By implementing this comprehensive compliance framework, legal and compliance teams can ensure their organization is fully prepared for the effective date of the amendments and maintain compliance with the updated Act.
|
END
LABOUR
| LAW AND TYPE OF NOTICE
BASIC CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT ACT:
Intention to deem performers in performance of Advertising, Artistic, and Cultural Activities in South Africa as employees: Comments invited
G 53987 RG 11930 GoN 7020
– Comment by 22 Feb 2026
23 January 2026
|
| APPLIES TO:
1. Advertising Industry Organisations 2. Arts, Entertainment, and Cultural Sector Organisations 3. Media and Creative Production Companies 4. Cultural and Performing Arts Organisations 5. Event Production, Live Entertainment & Festival Organisers 6. Any Organisation Using Performers in Advertising or Cultural Work |
| SUMMARY
If implemented, performers would gain access to key protections under several labour laws, including:
The change seeks to provide decent work, regulatory consistency, and social protection within the creative economy.
|
| FULL TEXT
|
| DETAILS
DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR
NO. R. 7020 23 January 2026
BASIC CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT ACT NO 75, 1997 INTENTION TO DEEM PERFORMERS IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ADVERTISING, ARTISTIC, AND CULTURAL ACTIVITIES IN SOUTH AFRICA AS EMPLOYEES
I, Nomakhosazana Meth, Minister of Employment and Labour, hereby in terms of section 83(2)(a) and (b) of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act, 1997 (Act No. 75 of 1997), and having considered the representations received following Government Notice No. 42900 of 4 December 2019, hereby give notice of my intention to deem all performers in the performance of advertising, artistic and cultural activities
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE FULL GAZETTE:
G 53987 RG 11930 GON 7020 – COMMENT BY 22 FEB 2026 23 JANUARY 2026
|
| LINK TO FULL NOTICE
Basic Conditions of Employment Act: Intention to deem performers in performance of Advertising, Artistic, and Cultural Activities in South Africa as employees: Comments invitedG 53987 RG 11930 GoN 7020 – Comment by 22 Feb 2026 23 January 2026
|
| ACTION
Ensure that you submit your comments before 22 February 2026.
|
END
| LAW AND TYPE OF NOTICE
LABOUR RELATIONS ACT:
Bargaining Council
|
| LINK TO FULL NOTICE
Labour Relations Act: Bargaining Council for the Civil Engineering Industry (BCCEI): Extension of conditions of Employment Collective Agreement to Non-PartiesG 53984 RG 11929 GoN 7012 23 January 2026
Labour Relations Act: National Bargaining Council of the Leather Industry of South Africa: Extension to Non- Parties of the Agency Shop Amending Collective Agreement for EmployeesG 53984 RG 11929 GoN 7014 23 January 2026
Labour Relations Act: Motor Industry Bargaining Council: Extension to non-parties of Autoworkers Provident Fund Collective AgreementG 53984 RG 11929 GoN 7016 23 January 2026
Labour Relations Act: Essential Services Committee: Investigation as to whether following services are essential: Maintenance of critical telecommunication infrastructure; Services by pilots, cabin crew, ground logistical staff and boarding gate agentsG 53986 GeN 3735 23 January 2026
Labour Relations Act: Bargaining Council for the Civil Engineering Industry (BCCEI): Conditions of Employment Collective Agreeement: CancellationG 53984 RG 11929 GoN 7011 23 January 2026
Labour Relations Act: Bargaining Council for the Civil Engineering Industry (BCCEI): Wage and Task Grade Collective Agreement: CancellationG 53984 RG 11929 GoN 7013 23 January 2026
Labour Relations Act: Motor Industry Bargaining Council: Extension to Non-Parties of the Motor Industry Provident Fund Collective AgreementG 53984 RG 11929 GoN 7015 23 January 2026
Labour Relations Act: Registration of employers’ organisation: The Cleaning Association of South Africa (CASA)G 53984 RG 11929 GoN 7017 23 January 2026
|
END
MEDICAL
|
| LAW AND TYPE OF NOTICE
MEDICAL SCHEMES ACT:
Adjustment to fees payable to brokers
G 54019 GoN
27 January 2026
|
| APPLIES TO:
1. All Registered Medical Schemes in South Africa 2. Healthcare Brokers and Broker Organisations 3. Administrators Acting on Behalf of Medical Schemes 4. Employer Groups that Use Brokers for Medical Scheme Benefits 5. The Council for Medical Schemes (CMS) |
| FULL TEXT
|
| DETAILS
|
| LINK TO FULL NOTICE
Medical Schemes Act: Adjustment to fees payable to brokersG 54019 GoN 27 January 2026
|
| ACTION
Take note
|
END
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
|
| LAW AND TYPE OF NOTICE
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AMENDMENT BILL:
Explanatory summary: Comments invited
G 53956 GeN 3726
– Comment by 15 Feb 2026
16 January 2026
|
| APPLIES TO:
|
| EXPLAINED AND UNPACKED
Detailed Summary and Related Action Points
Clause 1: Amendment of Section 1
Clause 2: Amendment of Section 14
Clause 3: Insertion of Sections 14A and 14B
Clause 4: Amendment of Section 60
Clause 5: Insertion of Section 60A
Clause 6: Amendment of Section 63
Clause 7: Amendment of Arrangement of Sections
Clause 8: Short Title and Commencement
4. Departments and Bodies Consulted
5. Financial Implications for the State
The Public Procurement Amendment Bill, 2026, aims to strengthen anti-corruption measures in South Africa’s public procurement sector by incentivizing whistleblowers, protecting their rights, and enabling private prosecutions. It also introduces stricter penalties for offences and provides a framework for monetary rewards tied to the recovery of state funds. The Bill seeks to address systemic corruption and empower individuals to report wrongdoing while ensuring their safety and recognition.
|
| FULL TEXT
|
| DETAILS
PARLIAMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
NOTICE 3726 OF 2026
MS M.P. KOBE, MP
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO INTRODUCE A PRIVATE MEMBER’S BILL AND INVITATION FOR COMMENT ON THE DRAFT PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AMENDMENT BILL, 2026
MS M.P. Kobe, MP, acting in accordance with section 73(2) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (“Constitution”), intends to introduce the Public Procurement Amendment Bill, 2026 (“draft Bill”), in Parliament. An explanatory summary of the draft Bill is hereby published in accordance with Rule 276(1)(c) of the Rules of the National Assembly (9th Edition).
South Africa’s experience with state capture, entrenched corruption networks, and the indispensable role played by whistleblowers during Judicial Commission of Inquiry into State Capture (“Zondo Commission”), highlights the urgent need to institutionalise whistleblower incentives in a sustainable, fair and appropriately scaled manner. Of particular concern and focus is the public procurement sector, which is estimated to account for over R800 billion in annual expenditure country wide.
Despite the vital contribution of whistleblowers in uncovering wrongdoing during the Zondo Commission, key recommendations relating to incentivising whistleblowers remain unimplemented. While sector-specific legislation such as the Marine Living Resources Act, 1998 (Act No. 18 of 1998), the National Forests Act, 1998 (Act No. 84 of 1998), and the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998), provide for financial rewards under limited conditions, these frameworks are narrow in scope and underutilised and do not offer a coherent systemic framework.
Of further concern is the National Prosecuting Authority’s (“NPA”) seeming repeated inability to effectively prosecute corruption and secure financial recoveries for the State. This systemic failure highlights the need to provide for private prosecutions whenever the NPA refuses or neglects to act.
There appears to be institutional hesitancy to effectively empower whistleblowers and to implement meaningful reward schemes capable of disrupting entrenched corruption networks. This may be attributed to capacity constraints, political sensitivity, and fear of unsettling entrenched patronage networks. Yet, research shows that whistleblower incentivisation coupled with private prosecution are highly effective anti-corruption tools, particularly in sectors marked by systemic corruption such as public procurement. For example, in the United States of America, the False Claims Act, 1863 (as (R52.2 billion) in 2024 alone. Similar models are now in place in the United Kingdom and several European jurisdictions.
In the Republic of South Africa, whistleblowers routinely face threats to their safety, livelihoods, and social standing. In tragic instances, such as the assassination of Babita Deokaran and Marius van der Merwe, the personal risks have proven fatal. It is unjust and unsustainable to expect whistleblowers to bear such burdens without meaningful support or recognition.
The draft Bill seeks to amend the Public Procurement Act, 2024 (Act No. 28 of 2024) (“principal Act”), by making provision for whistleblower disclosures in respect of any infringement or offence contemplated in the principal Act. The draft Bill further provides for monetary rewards to be awarded to persons whose whistleblower disclosures lead to the recovery of funds by the State. In addition, the draft Bill makes provision for offences in respect of whistleblower disclosures and the institution of private prosecutions for any offence committed in terms of the principal Act.
Interested parties and institutions are invited to submit written representations on the proposed content of the draft Bill to the Speaker of the National Assembly within 30 days of the publication of this notice. Representations can be delivered to the Speaker, New Assembly Building, Parliament Street, Cape Town; mailed to the Speaker, P O Box 15 Cape Town 8000, or emailed to speaker@parliament.gov.za and copied to parliament@actionsa.org.za.
Copies of the draft Bill may be accessed at this link: https://www.actionsa.org.za/bills
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CLICK HERE:
PUBLIC SECTOR: PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AMENDMENT BILL: EXPLANATORY SUMMARY: COMMENTS INVITED G 53956 GEN 3726 – COMMENT BY 15 FEB 2026 16 JANUARY 2026
|
| LINK TO FULL NOTICE
Public Procurement Amendment Bill: Explanatory summary: Comments invited
G 53956 GeN 3726 – Comment by 15 Feb 2026 16 January 2026
|
| ACTION
Ensure that you submit your comments before 15 February 2026
|
END
STANDARDS
|
| LAW AND TYPE OF NOTICE
STANDARDS ACT:
Standards matters: Comments invited
G 53991 GeN 3738
– Comment by 24 Mar 2026
23 January 2026
|
| LINK TO FULL NOTICE
Standards Act: Standards matters: Comments invitedG 53991 GeN 3738 – Comment by 24 Mar 2026 23 January 2026
|
| ACTION
Ensure that you submit your comments.
|
END
TRANSPORTATION
|
| LAW AND TYPE OF NOTICE
ROAD CARRIER PERMITS
|
| LINK TO FULL NOTICE
TRANSPORTATION: ROAD CARRIER PERMITS
|
END
ADVERTISING ARTICLES
|
| SOUTH AFRICA |
MTN’S Router Claims Deemed Misleading
The Advertising Appeals Committee has dismissed an appeal by MTN South Africa, confirming that its Shesh@600 product, which claims to offer a “free-to-use” router, was not always “free”, thus this statement was misleading
THE Advertising Appeals Committee has dismissed an appeal by MTN South Africa, confirming that its Shesh@600 product, which claims to offer a “free to-use” router, was not always “free”, thus this statement was misleading.
MTN was ordered last year to either remove or amend its “free-to-use” router advertising.
This followed a complaint by a consumer that he was charged an “activation fee” of R553 before MTN could activate the router for use.
MTN subsequently appealed against the Advertising Regulatory Board (ARB) Directorate’s ruling, which upheld the consumer’s complaint by finding that the “free-to-use” router claim in MTN’s Shesh@600 home internet advertising was misleading.
The advertising in issue is a campaign promoting MTN’s Shesh@600 5G/LTE Home Internet package, offering uncapped data with tiered speeds for a monthly subscription of R399. The offer appeared in a My Broadband advertorial.
MTN accepted that an upfront payment is required, but explained that this related to pro-rata subscription and a possible SIM activation fee, rather than a charge for the router itself. It referred to its applicable terms and conditions, which state that “MTN reserves the right to charge a SIM activation fee”.
MTN stated that customers were not required to make any further payment to obtain the “free” router and that any sales representative who had suggested otherwise was mistaken.
The ARB, however, earlier found that the advertising omitted material information about an additional, mandatory cost, and that the “free-to-use” claim, as presented, contravened its advertising code.
MTN on appeal said that the Directorate conflated the complainant’s misunderstanding about an upfront payment with an actual charge for the “free-to-use” router.
It submits that, properly understood, no fee of R553 was charged in relation to the router or its activation and that the Directorate’s finding of a “mandatory additional cost” is, therefore, incorrect.
However, in its written submissions, MTN indicated that the “SIM activation fee” is a discretionary charge provided for in its terms and conditions, and which is typically charged when a consumer opts to sign up for packages in-store.
MTN pointed out that both the general terms and conditions and the MyMTN Home Internet terms reserve the right to charge a SIM activation fee.
It also submitted that the SIM activation fee does not form part of the price of the router. In its view, the fee is not “in relation to the product or offer specifically” but is rather an administration charge of the dealer for handling the activation, which may or may not be levied at the dealer’s discretion.
Chairperson of the Advertising Appeal Committee, Advocate Nasreen Rajab-Budlender, in her findings earlier this month, said they accept MTN’s evidence that the consumer in this case was not charged a SIM activation fee and that the “free-to-use” router appeared on his invoices with a zero charge.
She conceded that the Directorate’s earlier assumption that the complainant was charged an upfront activation fee in respect of the router is incorrect.
However, the difficulty does not lie in an actual fee charged to this particular complainant, but in the structure of the offer and the way in which the “free-to-use” claim operates across the campaign, Rajab-Budlender said.
She explained that the existence of a SIM activation fee that may be charged to some consumers taking up the Shesh@600 offer, without a clear and prominent qualification in the advertising, means that the router cannot be described as “free-to-use”.
In turning down the appeal, she concluded that the advertising is likely to mislead consumers.
Zelda Venter The Star Early Edition
|
B-BBEE ARTICLES
|
| SOUTH AFRICA |
State dangles carrot in form of BEE points
Incentive offered for companies contributing 3% of their net profit after tax
The government is preparing to launch a revamped Transformation Fund as early as next week, rewriting incentives that have shaped corporate behaviour for more than two decades.
A trade, industry & competition ministerial briefing pack, seen by Business Day, shows that companies will be able to earn 30 broad-based BEE points by contributing 3% of net profit after tax to the fund — double the points currently available for the same outlay under traditional enterprise supplier development routes.
The 30-point reward is large enough for many companies to move up several levels on the broad-based BEE scorecard.
For companies in the midrange, a single contribution could lift them into level three or higher, improving access to government and corporate procurement without changes to ownership or management.
Early unsigned or conditional commitments listed in the briefing pack totalled R13.1bn, led by R10.8bn from Afreximbank and smaller entries of R500m each from the Unemployment Insurance Fund, Industrial Development Corporation and Development Bank of Southern Africa, while Vodacom-Masiv will pump in about R400m. These sums are not far from the fund’s annual mobilisation target of R20bn.
Special purpose vehicle
The fund will be capitalised through the aggregation of resources anchored in broad-based BEE policy provisions, complemented by contributions from mechanisms such as Competition Commission public interest commitments and other strategic funding partners, the document reads.
The fund will be in a special purpose vehicle incubated by the National Empowerment Fund, targeting a small set of priority sectors — renewable energy, manufacturing, agroprocessing, logistics and digital infrastructure — chosen for their ability to deliver jobs and industrial impact.
The fund will offer grants, loans, equity and business development support.
The document also shows the fund will be governed by a minister-appointed board, supported by a public-private investment committee.
Simplify compliance
The move could simplify compliance and channel more money to black-owned businesses, offering a fast shortcut to procurement competitiveness without forcing companies to restructure ownership or overhaul management.
However, it also concentrates decision-making in a minister-appointed board, potentially raising concern that the commercial rigour needed to turn pooled capital into jobs and business will be undermined by directors beholden to ministerial preferences.
The briefing broadly mirrors the same policy objective as reported by Business Day last year, centralising corporate transformation capital and offering a simple compliance route.
But it is likely to disappoint cheerleaders of the initial proposal to launch the department of trade, industry & competition into action last year. Under that proposal, unlisted companies would have been offered an opportunity to pay 3% of gross revenue into a revenue service-collected pool managed by a private fund of funds in exchange for automatic level three recognition.
That option offers the clearest, cheapest path to procurement advantage and the least compliance friction, one small business owner briefed on the department’s plans said.
Even market leaders with deep pockets find the administrative and operational demands of broad-based BEE compliance onerous.
Major companies and blue-chip firms maintain in-house transformation units — board-level social, ethics and sustainability committees — that adjust strategies to scorecard rules and pour millions into advisory and reporting to protect their ratings.
For black entrepreneurs, the fund promises scalable, patient capital aimed at townships and regional value chains that conventional enterprise development programmes have failed to reach.
Shortfall
The Gordon Institute of Business Science and the Broad-Based BEE Commission’s 2024 study shows that while enterprise supplier development spend has grown rapidly, actual outcomes, specifically for sustainable and scalable black businesses, have fallen short of expectations. They identified a chronic shortfall of affordable capital as the primary culprit.
The department first announced the Transformation Fund as a policy initiative at the beginning of 2025, setting a target to mobilise R100bn over the term of the current administration. It framed the fund as a way to aggregate existing enterprise and supplier development and related commitments to create scale and improve access to finance for black owned businesses.
However, the proposal was met with immediate governance concerns, with Business Unity South Africa signalling its willingness to participate but pushing for clarity on design, governance and implications.
The DA derided it as a “looting scheme” and “madness”, saying it repackages old programmes that have failed to make a dent in poverty and unemployment.
By Tiisetso Motsoeneng Businessday
|
FINANCE ARTICLES
|
| SOUTH AFRICA |
No big tax changes in February budget, says Godongwana
SARS is coming after taxpayers with a new weapon, leaving nowhere to hide
The South African Revenue Service (SARS) wants to introduce new laws that will enable wide-reaching lifestyle audits, helping it clamp down on taxpayers whose lifestyles don’t match their means.
The legislative changes are contained in the new draft General Laws (Anti-Money Laundering and Combating Terrorism Financing) Amendment Bill, published on 14 January 2026.
The proposals aim to grant the Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC) statutory power to conduct lifestyle audits.
The draft Bill defines a lifestyle audit as “an audit to determine if a person’s living standards are consistent with the income from legitimate sources that can be attributed to that person”.
According to Tax Consulting SA, once unexplained wealth is identified and reported to SARS, the taxman will pursue “individuals with unexplained wealth”, who may also come under the National Prosecuting Authority’s gaze.
One of the reasons the proposed change is so significant is because of how widely the lifestyle audit powers could spread.
The FIC is mandated to assist in identifying the proceeds of crime and safeguarding the country’s financial system—but it is also obligated to share the information it collects with numerous bodies.
As outlined in the draft Bill, the FIC is tasked with making the information it collects and produces available to:
“This means that detecting tax non-compliance will not remain within SARS’ ambit alone,” Tax Consulting said.
“The tax authority may now effectively have a broad range of state bodies reporting potential non-compliance to it.”
On the strength of information received from the FIC, all these organs of state can come after you, triggering SARS scrutiny.
The Draft Bill also makes clear that the FIC can conduct lifestyle audits on persons prescribed by the Minister at the request of an organ of state, public entity, or municipality, if it reasonably believes the entity is affected by, or has an interest in, the information it obtains through such an audit.
“With this widening of powers, the wolf is at the door for individuals who have been living an extravagant lifestyle they cannot justify by their declared income,” Tax Consulting said.
How you could get flagged
Tax Consulted said that lifestyle audits look at whether a person’s standard of living is consistent with income from legitimate sources and formally declared to SARS.
Importantly, it is not a voluntary process and is driven by intelligence, making the wider net in the draft Bill crucial for sniffing out discrepancies.
The FIC Act requires a person who carries on a business or an employee who suspects money laundering, terrorist financing, or an unusual transaction to report it to the FIC.
The FIC stipulates that all citizens have a responsibility to report suspicious and unusual transactions and behaviour.
So a taxpayer may get flagged by an anonymous report from a national department, or by a colleague or neighbour who suspects something untoward.
Flags may pop up in other instances too—such as owners of multi-million-rand supercars having their tax returns checked, or even when people post their exorbitant lifestyles on social media.
Once intelligence exists and is shared, the scope for remedial action narrows significantly.
“When an audit is underway, the state is no longer asking questions in the abstract. It is actively testing explanations against data already in its possession,” Tax Consulting said.
Once unexplained wealth is identified and reported, the group warned that the downstream risks for taxpayers escalate quickly.
“These include potentially significant additional tax assessments, understatement penalties of up to 200% of the tax outstanding, and even criminal prosecution,” it said.
“The only way to avoid this is by making use of SARS’ Voluntary Disclosure Programme, which guarantees waiver of all penalties and amnesty from criminal prosecution by the Commissioner of SARS.”
However, this won’t apply in instances of gross negligence or intentional tax evasion, it said.
Comment on the draft Bill closes on 13 February 2026.
Businesstech
|
HEALTH AND SAFETY ARTICLES
|
| SOUTH AFRICA | |
Pick n Pay again fails to avoid liability for shopper’s injuries
It’s been more than eight years since the customer was injured after slipping on a hazardous spill in a store in Cape Town.
Pick n Pay Retailers has failed in a further attempt to appeal a high court judgment that found it liable for the personal injuries, medical and other costs of a customer who slipped and fell in its N1 City Mall store in Cape Town.
The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) on Monday dismissed with costs an application by Pick n Pay Retailers for reconsideration of a ruling by SCA judges Fikile Mokgohloa and Wendy Hughes dismissing with costs the company’s petition for leave to appeal the high court judgment.
Mokgohloa and Hughes had dismissed Pick n Pay’s petition for leave to appeal on the basis that the proposed appeal lacked reasonable prospects of success and no other compelling reason existed to justify the matter being entertained on appeal.
However, SCA Deputy President Dumisani Zondi on 30 April 2024 ordered that Pick n Pay’s application be referred for reconsideration and possible variation in terms of the Superior Courts Act.
The injury
Maria Williams was shopping with her sister at the N1 City Mall Pick n Pay store in Goodwood on 13 November 2017.
As she was approaching the till point, Williams remembered that she had forgotten to collect an electric fly repellent – but slipped on some spillage and fell to the floor while proceeding at a brisk walking pace, but not running, to get the item.
She testified that she did not see any cleaning staff in the immediate vicinity of where she fell and the size of the spillage was about equal to an A3 piece of paper.
Williams disputed that the spillage was the size of a two-rand coin, as was asserted on behalf of Pick n Pay.
As a result of the fall, Williams sustained a soft tissue injury to her left hip and an injury to her left acromioclavicular joint.
Immediate assistance was provided to her by a customer services manager employed by Pick n Pay, who also arranged for her to be transported to a nearby hospital for medical treatment.
It was alleged that Pick n Pay undertook to bear Williams’s medical treatment costs but despite these assurances, Pick n Pay failed to honour its undertaking.
This prompted Williams to institute legal proceedings against Pick n Pay in the Western Cape High Court, where she sought payment of damages for past and future hospital, medical and related expenses, past and future loss of earnings, and general damages for pain and suffering.
Bluedot, a third-party service provider contracted to Pick n Pay under a cleaning service agreement between the parties, was cited as the second respondent.
What the high court found
Judge Patrick Gamble ruled in the Western Cape High Court on 1 September 2023 that Pick n Pay had failed to discharge the evidentiary burden required to rebut the prima facie case of negligence established by Williams.
The court found that Pick n Pay had not provided sufficient evidence to negate the inference of negligence arising from the circumstances of Williams’s fall.
It further ruled the injuries sustained by Williams were directly attributable to the negligent conduct of Pick n Pay’s employees, acting within the course and scope of their employment.
Pick n Pay was found to be legally liable to pay Williams “100% of such damages as she may establish in due course arising out of the incident”.
Aggrieved by the high court’s findings, Pick n Pay sought leave to appeal the decision to the full court of the Western Cape High Court on the grounds that the court had misdirected itself.
The high court dismissed the application for leave to appeal on 31 October 2023 on the basis that Pick n Pay had failed to show there was a reasonable prospect of success on appeal or “there is some other compelling reason why the appeal should be heard”.
This resulted in Pick n Pay petitioning the SCA for leave to appeal on the same grounds as in the high court.
How the Supreme Court of Appeal saw things
Handing down judgment on Monday, acting SCA Judge Daniel Dlodlo, with SCA Judge Xola Petse and acting SCA Judge Boissie Mbha concurring, said Pick n Pay concedes that it owed a general duty of care to all patrons entering its premises to ensure the store was reasonably safe for shopping activities but denies liability for the injuries sustained by Williams.
He said Pick n Pay claims the main cause of the incident was the sole negligence of Williams herself, who allegedly failed to maintain a proper lookout, neglected to take reasonable precautions to avoid the hazard, and thereby failed to prevent her own injury.
Dlodlo said Pick n Pay further claimed it discharged its duty of care to its customers by engaging the services of Bluedot, and in terms of the agreement, Bluedot undertook responsibility for the cleaning and maintenance of the store premises.
It also claimed that Bluedot assumed liability for any injuries arising from its failure to properly fulfil its contractual obligations.
He said Pick n Pay maintains that it acted reasonably in outsourcing these functions and cannot be held liable for any alleged negligence on the part of Bluedot.
Dlodlo said Pick n Pay also claimed the high court erred in both its interpretation and application of the relevant legal principles, and in its assessment of the facts underpinning the matter.
He said the evidence emerging from the record reveals that, on the day in question Pick n Pay – represented by one of its employees – was made aware of Williams’s injury not by its own staff, but by a field marketer employed by a third party.
“This fact is material in evaluating the adequacy of Pick n Pay’s internal safety protocols and its responsiveness to hazardous conditions on the premises as and when they arose,” he said.
Dlodlo said the absence of any Pick n Pay personnel in the immediate vicinity of the spillage at the time suggests the prescribed safety protocol was not adhered to.
He said it also indicates the spill had been present for a considerable amount of time, which supports the inference that the hazardous condition was not promptly addressed.
“Such a failure to implement or enforce routine checks, particularly in a human high-traffic retail environment where spillages are reasonably foreseeable, constitutes a material breach of the duty of care owed to patrons,” he said.
“The prolonged presence of the spill, coupled with lapses in procedural oversight, amounts to conduct that falls short of the standard expected.
“Accordingly, Pick n Pay’s omission in this regard is indicative of negligence.”
Judge Dlodlo said no factual or evidentiary basis has been advanced to suggest that another court would reach a different outcome from that of the high court.
He said the record also reveals no extraordinary or unusual circumstances warranting intervention by the SCA.
Judge Dlodlo said Pick n Pay’s petition “amounts to a mere attempt to reargue the merits of its case which … lacks substantive merit”.
By Roy Cokayne Moneyweb
| |
TOBACCO ARTICLES
| |
| SOUTH AFRICA |
SA losing ground to illicit economy, Sars warns
The commissioner of the South African Revenue Service (Sars), Edward Kieswetter, has warned that the country is not winning the war against criminal syndicates operating in the illicit economy.
Kieswetter was responding to the imminent closure of the only plant of British American Tobacco (BAT) in South Africa due to the proliferation of illicit cigarettes. The international tobacco major said illicit cigarettes now constitute 75% of the market.
The black market, which stretches from cigarettes, smuggled gold and fuel adulteration to counterfeiting, has become structural, he said.
“Take the tobacco sector as a cautionary tale.
Once a robust industry supporting tens of thousands of jobs, it has been devastated by illicit trade. Today, about three out of every four cigarettes sold in South Africa are illegal — untaxed and often produced or smuggled by organised crime syndicates,” Kieswetter said.
“The result is stark: the state loses R18bn R28bn a year in tobacco taxes; legitimate manufacturers cannot compete with dodgy 20-a-pack specials for R10, well below the minimum collectible tax of R26.22.”
BAT, whose shares are traded on the JSE and in London, earlier this month said it would mothball its Heidelberg plant at the year end and instead import tobacco to service the local market. It commissioned and paid for a study by Ipsos.
It found the availability of illegal cigarettes in South Africa has become endemic, with nearly eight in 10 South African retailers selling such products, triple the number reported three years ago.
The study, which surveyed more than 4,000 outlets countrywide, found about 69% of retailers were selling cigarettes at less than R20 a pack and nearly 80% were selling them below the R26.22 minimum price.
Gateway
More worryingly, Kieswetter said, illicit tobacco is not an isolated failure but a gateway into a far wider criminal economy.
“The same networks that trade illicit cigarettes frequently diversify into illegal mining, gold smuggling, illicit alcohol, counterfeit goods and complex money laundering schemes,” he said.
“Tobacco profits are reinvested into other illicit sectors using shared logistics routes, compliant retailers, cross-border channels and shell companies. This interconnectedness is the defining feature of South Africa’s illicit economy.”
Sars and its sister law enforcement agencies aim to “crush” the illicit fuel industry, which syphons nearly R4bn from the fiscus annually.
The agency and the police, through the National Joint Operational and Intelligence Structure (Nat-joints), conducted 23 operations across Gauteng, Mpumalanga and KwaZulu-Natal last year.
A team comprising Sars officials and police officers detained nearly 1-million litres of contaminated diesel fuel — with analysis in some instances showing the seized diesel had up to 68% paraffin content.
The agency also suspended three licences for non-compliant tobacco production.
The Financial Intelligence Centre has provided intelligence reports to Sars to assist in investigations of criminal syndicates, and together they have identified illicit markets in tobacco, precious metals, fuel and procurement fraud. Through these efforts Sars has recovered R85bn from illicit activities since 2020/21.
Kieswetter said while progress has been made in reining in the illicit economy, much more still needs to be done by law enforcement agencies.
Not winning
“We are not winning the war — yet. The scale of the illicit economy means enforcement is constantly chasing volume. For every warehouse seized or consignment intercepted, syndicates attempt to adapt, reroute and scale.”
“Border capacity remains uneven, legal and policy gaps persist, and penalties do not always deter well-resourced criminal kingpins. Corruption and collusion — whether at ports, factories or distribution points — can still unravel enforcement gains with devastating speed.”
Minister of finance Enoch Godongwana in the medium-term budget policy statement in November warned about the growing markets for illicit cigarettes, alcohol and fuel.
The black market, from cigarettes, smuggled gold and fuel adulteration to counterfeiting, has become structural.
By Kabelo Khumalo Businessday
|
TRANSPORTATION ARTICLES
|
| SOUTH AFRICA |
ANC condemns scholar transport operators’ ‘arrogance’ in flouting law after accident
The African National Congress (ANC) has condemned recent threats made by scholar transport operators, following the impounding of unroadworthy vehicles, saying this demonstrates “arrogance and unpreparedness” in terms of compliance with the law.
ANC national spokesperson Mahlengi Bhengu said the law must respond equally to the “nonchalant and indifferent attitude” of the scholar transport and taxi industry.
More than 60 scholar transport vehicles have been impounded during an operation led by Transport Minister Barbara Creecy in Lenasia, south of Johannesburg.
This after 14 school children died in a collision between a minibus and a truck.
The drivers of scholar transports threatened to stop collecting and dropping off learners, this after the Transport Department embarked on an unannounced blitz and impounded some unroadworthy minibus taxis.
“We are most disadvantaged in this business, and they do not do anything to help us. We said to them when we bought these cars, they were new, so these cars are now old. The next thing we are being targeted,” they said.
The Scholar Transport Association bosses believe they were ambushed and bullied.
The association said it wanted a peaceful protest, where it would meet with government so it could get answers as to when the drivers would get the permits they applied for.
Bhengu said the deaths and the state of scholar transport were of grave concern, and she called for stricter regulation of the industry through enforcement and a revamp of scholar transport policy.
“Our observation of the industry, including the entire taxi industry has revealed serious shortcomings, unroadworthy vehicles, overloading, noncompliance with the law, reckless and negligent driving and disrespect towards commuters and other road users,” she said.
She said any noncompliant vehicle must be impounded, encouraging parents to choose “the best and safer services” in the best interest of their children.
Meanwhile, Select Committee on Education, Sciences and the Creative Industries chairperson Makhi Feni called on law enforcement agencies to hold the minibus driver involved in the accident accountable and include a possible ban from driving on South Africa’s roads.
“It seems nothing will make taxi drivers change their behaviour and make them respect traffic laws. Police should be given full powers to handle criminality on our roads as it relates to driver behaviour.
The road network is a shared service which demands that drivers respect other road users,” he said.
MULTISECTOR ACTION
The Public Servants Association (PSA) said government’s response after every incident or accident was to call for reform without any action.
The PSA suggested an urgent National Scholar Transport Imbizo, that involves the Department of Basic Education, provincial Departments of Education, national and provincial Departments of Transport, Treasury, budget oversight structures, law enforcement agencies, road safety authorities, unions, scholar transport associations, private operators, school governing bodies, parent organisations, civil society and child rights advocacy groups, road safety researchers, engineers, and policy experts.
The organisation wants the Imbizo to result in the design and commitment to an enforceable national action plan, closing of regulatory gaps, establishment of safety standards, stricter vehicle enforcement, strengthened licensing and vetting for all scholar transport drivers, implementation of technology-enabled monitoring systems, securing interdepartmental accountability and ensuring sustainable funding models.
The PSA said multisector action was the “only way to break the cycle of reactive government messaging and deliver the systemic reform needed to safeguard learners”.
|
- END